Sunday, May 15, 2011

Alex Gillis; "A Killing Art"

I am sometimes late to the party, but when I get there I drink my share.
Which is why I am thrilled to review "A Killing Art", by Alex Gillis. This book, which was written in 2008 somehow escaped me until one of my Tae Kwon Do instructors from the past sent me a copy.
And boy did I drink my share; this book is not your typical background of Tae Kwon Do as a contemporary martial art. It is a historical account of The struggle of oppressed Korea, both North and South.
It is the story of the men who fought hand-to-hand in trench warfare against Communist soldiers and returned to refine the Shotokan Karate learned under Japanese rule to a uniquely Korean art that would aid the development of the emerging South Korean industrial tiger. The book is part history, part espionage, and the gradual emerging of western thought in a country that was steeped in stoic Confucian values of the past.
Author Gillis has poured over 4,000 pages of the U.S. Congressional investigation known as "Koreagate", conducted countless interviews and footnoted every reference in the book for further review. This book was researched in the best of journalistic methods and may be the most comprehensive book on the subject.
"A Killing Art" centers on the struggle between rivals to create Tae Kwon Do from the trench warfare era to present time. General Choi Hong-hi was instrumental in molding Korea's martial art from Japanese Shotokan, through the phase where nine separate schools (Tang Soo Do, Chung Do Kwan, Ji Do Kwan etc.), all of which had Japanese or Chinese influence became "Tae Kwon Do", or "foot-fist way".
General Choi, hardened by the war, favored a realistic fighting system and created the International Tae Kwon Do Association (ITF). Choi's art retained killing techniques, but began to be out shadowed by the emerging sport version favored by Korean Secret Service official Kim Un-yong. Here begins the internal war between the original battlefield martial art and Olympic sport Tae Kwon Do under the World Tae Kwon Do association (WTF).
Under treaties between the U.S. and South Korea, money for development flowed into South Korea in the 1960's, and Korea sent 300,000 trained soldiers to aid the U.S. and South Vietnamese in the Vietnam war. Likewise, thousands of U.S. servicemen were trained in using Tae Kwon Do in hand-to-hand combat. Tae Kwon Do became intrinsically linked to war and espionage, with thugs and gangsters enjoying it's use also.
Author Gillis describes how scandals developed involving the Korean CIA, shakedowns and kidnappings in Europe, The U.S. and elsewhere that led to misery and torture under the hands of Korean dictatorships. Gillis himself interviewed some of these agents in researching the book. Here-in-lies the dark side of the martial art known as Tae Kwon Do.
Alex Gillis pulls no punches in describing how Tae Kwon Do fell into decline with Olympic Tae Kwon Do and the shopping mall McDojo era. He describes the scandals revolving around the Olympics, and how the sport was corrupt and too boring for spectators to follow. The martial spirit was replaced with a careful game of tag that was often predetermined by corrupt judging and what is referred to as "branch trimming".
What sticks out most clearly, is that the same issues and criticism of Tae Kwon Do as a sport were played out by a bitter, aging General Choi (who appears to have been a North Korean agent) against his rival, the KCIA-embedded Kim Un-yong.
In "A Killing Art", Alex Gillis has compiled the best history of war-torn Korea and the subsequent dictatorships, the scandals involving espionage, U.S. Congressional members, and the pure athleticism of the men of Tae Kwon Do.
-It's one of my favorites, and has informed me towards future projects of my own.


Craig Willits said...

I read A Killing Art a couple years ago.

It's definitely not a book for people who subscribe to the cult of personality surrounding Choi or Kim. It shows more than a few cracks in their feet of clay.

Also, it blows more than a few holes in the TKD mythology that was manufactured by Choi and has lived on in propaganda and marketing hype spread by the ITF, the WTF, and the Korean government.

Glad to read your perspective!


B said...

Dang but how did I not ever hear of this one? Added to my growing list!


Man of the West said...

When I was in TKD more than twenty years ago, I trained under one of the most "traditional" instructors in Oklahoma at the time, and then under one of his students, and finally under a very independent group of people. The TKD I learned then had absolutely no emphasis on self-defense, but on the other hand, if you spent a couple of years in it, you would at least learn how to kick and punch very, very hard, and that's not a bad thing.

I see TKD in videos and on TV now, and it's just impossible to see it as a martial art anymore. Just a sport...

Nathan at TDA Training said...

Looks like a must-read. Your recent posts are right in that internal and national Korean politics and other things had changed TKD. Maybe for the worse?

Good one!

a.gillis said...

Thanks for the feedback on this site, everyone. The book took seven years of work, but it was worth the effort, judging from the hundreds of supportive letters I've received. The book is still selling strong, and there's a lot of interest, especially among black belts, in finding out the truth about our martial art.

Alex Gillis

Nathan at TDA Training said...

While I can't comment on the book, itself, I can only be impressed that Mr. Gillis took the time,effort, and interest in exposing something that definitely always been on the minds of anyone who's trained in TKD for any length of time. There's so much mystery and politics shrouding the origins and history of this young collection of styles, and it's only appropriate to get the truth out. Thanks to Dojo Rat for the post, and I'll look forward to hearing more from my colleagues on it.

Nathan at TDA Training said...

The posts by you and Bob on this at Striking Thoughts made me think of things from a "What should you do about it" perspective. Would love your thoughts to this post: